Why Crocker's lipstick actually made the pig even uglier:
The long-anticipated joint congressional testimony of General David Petraeus and Ambassador to Iraq Ryan Crocker is now history, and the event's few fireworks have been widely documented. The conventional wisdom had been to expect kinder depictions of broad progress from the general than from the ambassador. What we saw instead was precisely the opposite. Both men were optimistic—more so than Democrats, moderate Republicans, and many other critics thought reasonable. But it was Crocker, not Petraeus, who painted over his mission's most pressing concerns.Perhaps Crocker's single biggest claim during his two days on Capitol Hill was this: "The IMF estimates that economic growth will exceed 6 percent for 2007." It's a true statement as far as it goes, but the International Monetary Fund's Executive Board reported the figure with less enthusiasm. "Economic growth has been slower than expected," the IMF fretted, "mainly because the expected expansion of oil production has not materialized."
Get the details. Give it a read.
Comments
Iraq's oil revenue minus Big Oil's expected share minus Iraqi bribes and theft equals zero (Oil contribution to Iraqi GDP).
Iraqi population divided by zero Oil GDP equals zero (oil GDP per capita).
Call Wolfowitz. He must understand how much Iraq's oil will pay for.
Actually, Iraqi population divided by zero is an undefined number... basically infinity. :)
Post A Comment