Almost daily Corner bashing

I think it's pretty obvious that almost zero in-the-know conservatives actually believe the things they say about Hillary Clinton, and here's some proof from Lisa Schiffren over at the world's finest blog:


On the small point of Hillary analogizing herself to Eugene McCarthy — let's not quibble, regardless of her actual pro-war votes — and consistently inconsistent need to present herself as both hawkish and anti-war. McCarthy's campaign had the best possible result. We can only wish it for Hillary.

Yes. See, the fact that Hillary Clinton, contra Eugene McCarthy, votes like a Republican on a great number of issues doesn't matter to Republicans. She must be defeated. The reason, though, at least as far as Lisa Schiffren is concerned, is that Hillary Clinton's too ugly to run the kind of campaign she's been running:

at the rally at alumnae hall, the background music was The Police, singing "Every Little Thing She Does is Magic." And then, the reporter says, a male voice came over the PA system, urging the female students to "get excited." They responded with a big "wooooo." That's what you'd expect for a rock star, or a sex goddess. Is she, say, Madonna circa 1988? We've all seen the dreadful yearbook pictures from her Wellesley days. What a moment of triumph — to get to walk back in as a conquering heroine, and engineer the crowd's response.

I'm trying really hard to imagine Margaret Thatcher, or Indira Gandhi, or Golda Meir — or even Benazir Bhutto, (who was young and beautiful — if inept— during her first couple of runs for high office), entering a political rally to "Every Little Thing She Does is Magic…" Not happening. The Latin American "wives of" candidates — sure.

Stellar.

Comments

Brian, you punish yourself by lurking in those corner places. Commenting on their silliness is just troll feeding, and the collective judgement of the blog world is that troll feeding just encourages their outrages. They should get only well-deserved ignominity.

Posted by: JimPortlandOR on November 2, 2007 02:09 PM

In other words, it's a good way to get people like me to comment, when I wouldn't otherwise.

The point of the first section is that HRC is overly equivocal, refuses to take a stand or lead on anything, and shouldn't be trusted. It doesn't sound as if you actually disagree with this.

And the secondpoint is not at all that HRC is "ugly" -- that's you speaking, buddy. The point is that her campaign is undignified. Thatcher, Meir and Bhutto didn't run "as women," which Clinton seems to be doing now. I'm sure you agree that the scene as described is a little demeaning.

Posted by: CosmoReaxer on November 2, 2007 03:49 PM

I like this bit: 'urging the female students to "get excited."'

Just the female students? Or all the students, which, as it was Wellesley, were all female?

Posted by: David Margolies on November 2, 2007 03:51 PM

Well, I guess that means if Madonna ran for president on the Clinton platform with Clinton's campaign music, Lisa would've just written something like "Madonna should really run a more dignified campaign" instead of what she actually wrote, which implies that Hillary is no rock star or sex goddess.

Posted by: Brian on November 2, 2007 04:11 PM

Um... okay. If this is Corner-bashing, it's pretty weak sauce.

Posted by: CosmoReaxer on November 2, 2007 06:09 PM

Post A Comment