More Faludi

I haven't read The Terror Dream, so I'm not exactly an authority here, but it seems to me that Megan's description of the book--that "she apparently argues that 9/11 was an excuse to push women back into the kitchen"--seems to in no way resemble the description of the book on Faludi's website:

In this, the most original examination of post-9/11 America, Susan Faludi shines a light on the country's psychological response to the attacks on that terrible day. Turning her laser-sharp observational powers on the media, popular culture, and political life, Faludi unearths a barely acknowledged but bedrock societal drama shot through with baffling contradictions. Why, she asks, did an assault on American global dominance provoke an almost hysterical summons to restore "traditional" manhood, marriage, and maternity? Why did our media react as if the hijackers had targeted not a commercial and military edifice but the family home and nursery? Why did an attack fueled by hatred of Western emancipation lead to a regressive fixation on Doris Day womanhood and John Wayne masculinity, with trembling-lipped "security moms," swaggering presidential gunslingers, and the "rescue" of a female soldier compulsively recast as a "helpless little girl"?

The answer, Faludi finds, lies in a historical anomaly unique to the American experience: the nation that in recent memory has been least vulnerable to domestic attack is also a nation haunted by a centuries-long trauma of assault on its home soil. For nearly two hundred years, our central drama was not the invincibility of our frontiersmen but their inability to repel invasions of non-Christian, nonwhite "barbarians" from the homestead door. To conceal the insecurity bred by those attacks, American culture would generate an ironclad countermyth of cowboy swagger and feminine frailty, which has been reanimated whenever the nation feels threatened. On September 11, Americans were once again returned to an experience of homeland terror and humiliation. And, once again, they fled from self-knowledge and retreated into myth.

Brilliant and important, The Terror Dream is ultimately concerned not with what 9/11 did to women or men but with what it revealed about all of us—granting us the opportunity to look at ourselves anew.

Comments

Doesn't McCardle's summary seem more charitable?

Posted by: SomeCallMeTim on November 8, 2007 04:44 PM

Does it seem to you actually in any way accurate to say that 9/11 has caused a massive retreat to traditional gender stereotypes? Because this seems to me like the thesis of a bad freshman term paper. Backlash made some interesting, if terribly overblown, points, but the current incarnation just seems silly.

Posted by: Megan McArdle on November 8, 2007 05:27 PM

This--Why, she asks, did an assault on American global dominance provoke an almost hysterical summons to restore "traditional" manhood, marriage, and maternity?--seems like nonsense.

This, by contrast, seems indisputably true: Why did our media react as if the hijackers had targeted not a commercial and military edifice but the family home and nursery? Why did an attack fueled by hatred of Western emancipation lead to a regressive fixation on Doris Day womanhood and John Wayne masculinity, with trembling-lipped "security moms," swaggering presidential gunslingers, and the "rescue" of a female soldier compulsively recast as a "helpless little girl"?

I don't know how well she defends her explanation, which doesn't seem too weird to me, but it certainly doesn't look to me as if she's saying that 9/11 gave the government cover to enact their hidden agenda of reverting to 1800s-era gender divisions.

Posted by: Brian on November 8, 2007 07:31 PM

It sounds to me like she caught The Searchers on AMC at a moment when she needed some extra income. And the bit you quote approvingly doesn't seem true: I don't remember any Doris Day-ing, for example.

Posted by: SomeCallMeTim on November 8, 2007 08:43 PM

Que sera sera :)

Didn't Doris star in a moviefilm called Revenge of the Midwestern Security Moms?

Posted by: Brian on November 8, 2007 09:02 PM

Doris Day made out with Rock Hudson who was gay and had HIV and 9/11 was retribution for that. Or something.

All that is indisputably true is: anybody can publish anything; and: Megan isn't afraid to make ridiculous comments on her blog.

Posted by: madcarla on November 8, 2007 10:58 PM

Megan isn't afraid to make ridiculous comments on her blog.

May be true, but the bit Beutler quoted isn't evidence of that.

Posted by: SomeCallMeTim on November 9, 2007 10:21 AM

Post A Comment