Rights and abortion

So have you heard? Sarah Palin isn't very well educated. Liberals are jumping all over this one, but I think slightly unfairly. There is a real constituency of genuine pro-life, pro-privacy conservatives out there, and a smarter one could have articulated this position more clearly. The Constitution doesn't contain the words "abortion" or "privacy", so liberals and conservatives alike spill a lot of ink and burn up a lot of pixels trying to find constitutional grounds for their positions. Some of those conservatives, I suppose, believe that the Constitution doesn't strictly speaking guarantee a right to privacy even if, say, the fourth amendment has the effect of protecting peoples' privacy.

Others believe that it does. For them, it's a hardly unprecedented matter of competing rights. Because they also believe that fetuses are humans and abortion is murder. To them, you have as much right to an abortion as you do to lure a man into the privacy of your home and kill him. It's a perfectly consistent and sensible position... because they're pro-life. Unfortunately for John McCain, he didn't choose a running mate who was capable of articulating the nuance.

Comments

Are privacy and autonomy being confused here? We should not confuse them, and we should not allow the Right to conflate them.

That said, the number of "conservatives" who believe in privacy OR autonomy is too small to be influential. No one today has more privacy or autonomy than they had thirty years ago; most people have vastly less, unless they had little to begin with.

Posted by: Frank Wilhoit on October 2, 2008 03:45 PM

Easiest way to explain this is certainly not that Palin concedes that privacy is implicit in several other Amendments, yet feels that abortion is beyond the purview of this non-textual right

Occam's razor: Sarah Palin has no idea what she is talking about. ever.

Posted by: JMC on October 2, 2008 07:13 PM

Post A Comment